Two-Blockered Monster

The two-blockered monster in net this season for the Chicago Blackhawks is certainly an atypical, if not, in this case, unexpected, strategy, but Joel Quenneville may be able to take another uncommon path in net later in the year. 

In this very space this morning, John said that folks rumbling for more Nikolai Khabibulin net time are “just uncomfortable about a situation like this”; that fans just aren’t used to a two-goalie system.  As John says, “Most seasons, a team has one goalie they lean on, and then, there’s the back-up.”  And, while I don’t disagree, John implies in the same breath that Q should pick one goalie come playoff time, and only go to the other if necessary, ala last season’s Detroit Red Wings, who started Dominic Hasek but switched to Chris Osgood during the opening round against the Nashville Predators.  

Why, though?  Consider this: if your favorite Major League Baseball team had two “ace” starting pitchers, and it was physically possible for either to start each and every playoff game, would you want him to?  In other words, if one “ace” was capable of starting every playoff game, would you sit the other “ace” permanently in favor of the first, and only call on the second “ace,” if necessary?  I say not.  I think many of you – as well as your favorite team’s manager – would prefer to rotate the pitchers and give the opposition “different looks” during different games, so that the opposition couldn’t make adjustments as easily.

Now, I know there are basic differences between hockey and baseball.  The relationship between pitcher and hitter is perhaps more fundamental than that of skaters and goalies.  But, I think the same argument applies; playing the same goalie every game could allow the opposition to make adjustments more easily. 

I know the practice of playing one goaltender during playoff series is almost gospel in the NHL, but so long as both ‘tenders play well down the stretch – and that’s a big “if” – and neither goalie stands on his head come April, I see no reason to break recent convention just because it’s customary to do so.

Bottom line: while most of us are used to having a “starting” goalie and a “back-up” ‘tender – Ed Belfour played at least 70 games for the ‘Hawks three out of four seasons in the early ’90s – forty-nine games into this season, Khabibulin has played 25 games, and Cristobal Huet has played 24.  In so doing, this season’s goaltending tandem has stretched our imagination when it comes to NHL goalie rotations. 

So, why stop in March?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Random Thoughts. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Two-Blockered Monster

  1. John says:

    I think you’re a bit ahead of your time in this strategy. Eventually it will happen, but it’s going to be a coach who is more experimental and a non-traditionalist. I have a hard time believing Quenneville will feel comfortable doing this in a playoff series. Especially after hearing his interview from Friday night with resident Score knucklehead, sir Jesse Rogers.

  2. blackhawkbob says:

    I can’t disagree with that, but everyone speaks as though a decision must be made as to who the starting goalie will be down the stretch. I’m not sure that’s so.

    I do realize, however, that Q’s unlikely to follow this advice.

  3. coach says:

    Just a question Bob, who was Belfour’s goaltending teammate during those years and could they even start for another NHL team or IHL for that matter.

  4. John says:

    Yeah, Dominik Hasek was pretty much worthless.

  5. blackhawkbob says:

    Hasek, Waite and Hackett.

    And, I’m not saying that was the right or wrong way – just that it’s helped shape our views of how a goalie rotation should go.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s