Back to the Suture

News broke yesterday that Blackhawks centerman Dave Bolland would have back surgery. This announcement came on the heels of speculation that Bolland was hurting and that he and the Blackhawks were mulling over ideas to help cure the pain. The Blackhawks press release – which hit just after the close of business, those sly devil dogs – contained a quote from Bolland’s surgeon, pronouncing everyone’s favorite number two center out for three to four months.

(As an aside, as late as Monday, the Blackhawks were stating publicly that, although surgery was an option, no decision had been made as to the mode of treatment Bolland would receive for his balky back. Lo and behold, the next official Blackhawk announcement comes yesterday, announcing Bolland had undergone successful surgery. So, for all our doctors out there – paging Dr. Morris, Dr. Morris – is it possible to be mulling back treatments one day and to undergo surgery to correct a herniated disk the next? Isn’t there some blood work or fasting involved here? Hey, I guess we should just be happy they didn’t sell it as “an upper body procedure.”)

Immediately, the internets went aflutter. What would the Hawks do without their third line center who aspires to be a top-six forward?

My take: eh. The Hawks are off to a decent start (9-5-2) – other than missing the boat on the chance to waive ‘dis Huet guy during the first week of October, I mean – without, of course, Marian Hossa, Jonathan Toews (six games missed) and Ben Eager (13 games missed). And, let’s face it, Bolland hasn’t really played a game all season; his injury was serious from the word “go” this fall. He just wasn’t the same player we saw last year, and the Hawks have been fine up to now.

Sure, the injury forces either (i) a bottom-six center to center a second line or (ii) a winger to move to the middle for the next 12 weeks. The good news is (i) Dave Bolland himself is a bottom-six center (at this point in his career) attempting to play center on a second line and (ii) wingers played center last season until the trade deadline in February to fine results. Remember that the Hawks played most of the season with only three bona fide centers – and one was named Colin Fraser. At least this time around the Hawks have a center in Andrew Ebbett who has shown himself to be capable in the role of scoring center – let’s hope the Hawks let him do it for a while – and a traditional third line center in John Madden.

Then, Steve Rosenbloom of the Chicago Tribune Rosenblog beat all the journalists to the punch on the big-hitting no-story of the day: Forsberg to the Hawks. Normally I link these sorts of things, but when the writer wrote the story to drum up fake national attention, I say “nay.” Google it.  You’re not getting these 50 hits, Rosenbloom!

(As another aside, there have been pages upon pages written about the differences between “real journalists” and bloggers in the past few years. (And, let’s ignore the fact that Rosenbloom’s story was posted on a “blog.”) Sure, the way we receive news and analysis is changing, but one difference between the two parties that’s rarely discussed is journalists’ willingness to write the “sexy story,” even when it’s ridiculous.

Typical, run-of-the-mill journalists print what their readers want to read, rather than the truthful analysis the readers deserve. Rosenbloom assumed his readers wanted to be comforted by the thought of watching Peter Forsberg center Patrick Kane and Marian Hossa for the next six months, so he ignored the fact that the odds are better that I’ll win the Norris Trophy this spring.

In the end, we got the usual, knee-jerk journalist’s reaction to an injury: a thoughtless hype on why the team needs an aging veteran who was euthanized by the hockey gods years ago.)

Don’t get me wrong: if this were 1996, I’d be driving the “Peter Forsberg to the Hawks” bus. I’d even grow mutton chops and start smoking.

But, it’s 2009. Sure, he’s only 36, but Forsberg hasn’t been a contributing regular in the NHL since 2002-2003, and his foot has limited him to 66 games in the last three seasons, not counting the current one. With that track record, Rocky Wirtz might as well go to the United Center roof and start throwing $100 bills on to the street, because Peter Forsberg will likely be physically unable to earn the money any team throws at him.

He’s a fantastic player; one look at his career stats will show that. But, his feet have lived the lives of a thousand nomads.

So, unfortunately for the Hawks, Peter Forsberg is not the answer; it’s fortunate, then, that they don’t necessarily need one.

*On the Farm*

–Byron Froese scored a goal and Kyle Beach had a goal and an assist in Everett’s 5-2 victory over Spokane.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Rumors and Happenings. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Back to the Suture

  1. Dave Morris says:

    Pretty darn good blog.

  2. Dave Morris says:

    …of course we’ll never know the actual timeline of Bolland’s back problem and how it reached the stage where surgery–always a last resort–was elected as the solution.

    I tend to give great credit to the extraordinary ability of sports doctors and therapists. So maybe Bolland will be healthier, and a better player, as a result. Maybe not.

    Such are the risks in professional sports.

    In the meantime, Bowman will figure out what he needs or doesn’t need to do. That’s what he’s paid for.

  3. Patrick says:

    Good points…

    Any idea on how and when the $6 million-dollar-Bolland hurt his back – was it before or after he signed his contract? We’ve seen this movie before, so just wonderin’…

  4. blackhawkbob says:

    Patrick:

    It seems from all reports that Bolland’s back has been an issue for quite some time, dating back to last season, if not before. Like Hossa, while he was able to play with it last season, it apparently became too much to handle more recently.

  5. kevin k says:

    so Kyle Beach is just murdering, isn’t he? seems like every re-cap the dude has two more points.

  6. blackhawkbob says:

    I suppose you could say that, Kevin. In 16 games, Beach if fifth in the league with 15 goals, but all the scorers ahead of him in that category have played at least 20 games. With only a few assists, though, he’s 46th in league scoring.

  7. Patrick says:

    If Ebbett can play with Hossa and Kane (and actually produce) and if Bolland can make it back by the playoffs, I say hold tight. Then again, my thinking could shift in a few minutes, days, weeks (etc) so it’s good that Stan’s the Man…

  8. Dave Morris says:

    HAWKS WIN!!! HAWKS WIN!!!
    🙂 🙂 🙂

  9. JM says:

    Has there been a shift Kane has played this season where he failed to do something to make you say, “he’s good” to yourself?

    As to the Forsberg Saga, I say he’s a surefire bet to join the team as soon as Derrick Brooks is a Bear.

  10. Dave C says:

    Wake up!!! The Hawks can only do so much, with the stupid SALARY CAP! Or should they trade away some really good prospects to keep the tem going really good for the future, for a “short-term fix”.

    Who is the idiot that said that the Hawks should get Forsberg!!!!!!! NEVER!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s