It’s garnered quite a bit of attention recently, but the “tagging rule” has been utterly irrelevant in Chicago since the execution of the current NHL collective bargaining agreement. So, what is it?
Essentially – taking the Blackhawks current situation – the “tagging rule” mandates that Stan Bowman and the Hawks “tag” certain expiring contracts in the amount of the new payouts before any extension may be reached.
In other words, the Hawks may not extend the contracts of Duncan Keith, Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane unless the aggregate averaged annual amount of those contracts exceeds the combination of (a) the Hawks’ current payroll room and (b) the aggregate averaged amounts of any contracts which expire at year’s end, including those of Keith, Toews and Kane.
(Moreover, the date of December 1 is irrelevant to the situation involving extended players, as opposed to players signed in a year for play in that particular year.)
As an example, assume the Hawks have $500,000 in current payroll room (i.e., that the current year’s salary cap is $56,800,000 and the Hawks are/will be at $56,300,000 for player salaries – wishful thinking, to be sure) and $16,500,000 in expiring contracts, including those amounts currently paid to Keith, Toews and Kane.
In this hypothetical – I call it a hypothetical, because I don’t entirely trust on-line sources that purport to tell viewers each team’s payouts and cap situations – the Hawks may only extend the three to an aggregate annual averaged salary of no more than $17,000,000, the combination of the $500,000 of current payroll room and the $16,500,000 in expiring contracts. The $17,000,000 in payroll room and expiring contracts would, in this hypothetical, be “tagged” for purposes of other in-year transactions of this sort. Then, those “tagged” contracts may not be “tagged” and used as expiring contracts in this equation for a subsequent in-season transaction.
It all begs the question: if expiring contracts are “tagged,” does that mean that those contracts may not be extended?
The answer is “yes and no.” (Isn’t it always?) The mere act of “tagging” a player’s contract does not in and of itself mean that the player may not return to the team for the following season, but, for all practical purposes – especially in the Blackhawks’ case – it means that the player’s contract won’t be extended during the season.
If the contract was extended, more tagged payroll room would have to be created just as outlined above, and in a season where the “one goal” is winning a Stanley Cup, going to any great length to secure supporting contracts for next season doesn’t make much sense.
And, now deep thoughts…
Twelve days, six games, two provinces, a state: it’s no wonder they call it the “circus trip.” A very solid 2008-2009 circus trip seemed to catapult last year’s Hawks, but this trip will be much more difficult. The Flames, Oilers, Canucks, Sharks and Kings could all be said to significantly better this season than last, and the Ducks are no push-overs. Eight points would be a wildly successful trip.
Patrick Kane is quickly becoming a player capable of anything during any shift.
What was your favorite moment of the Andrew Ebbett era?
The Legend of Adam Burish seems to be growing quite well. Any game where the Hawks play flat (i.e., the Vancouver game), the first thing out of someone’s mouth is “This wouldn’t have happened if Burish was playing.” While Burish had one of the more memorable post-seasons of anyone wearing an Indian head, what people forget is how utterly useless he was for half of the regular season last year. (There’s hope for Tomas Kopecky just yet!) The Hawks played just as many flat games last year with a healthy Burish in the line-up.
Hypothetical question: If Dustin Byfuglien has as good a post-season as he did last year, is it still alright if he disappears for stretches in the regular season this year?
Our early season hypothetical involving the Red Wings claiming a waived Cristobal Huet certainly seems much more plausible these days – what with the Wings’ goaltending experiencing its typical midseason swoon. It’s what makes using the words “Chris Osgood” and “Hall of Fame” without “cleaning crew” seem wrong.
There’s been a lot of statistical analysis written on the interwebs about how the Maple Leafs aren’t as bad as their record indicates. After watching them up close, they may not be bottom of the Eastern Conference bad, but they still blow.
Let’s put a ruling out there. No more talking about next season until this season is over. We’re 19 games into this season. How about we wait and see how everything shakes out before we determine our lives aren’t worth living without the services of John Madden and Ben Eager?
The Atlantic Division is very close to becoming a ‘thing’. It’s still ridiculously early but at this point, all five teams would qualify for the Eastern Conference playoffs. Though Nashville was 3 points away from giving the Central a clean sweep last year, no division has ever sent all five teams to the playoffs since the NHL expanded to six divisions.
Speaking of the Central, since the Predators 2-0 loss to the Hawks on October 24th, they’ve gone 8-2-0. You could chop off Barry Trotz’s undersized head from his overgrown shoulders and he’d grow another one within ten minutes … and Barry Trotz’s new head and old body would still squeak the Predators into the playoffs.
*On the Farm*
—The IceHogs dropped another game to the Texas Stars, 3-1. After Bracken Kearns got the Hogs on the board early with a power play tally, the Stars’ Warren Peters scored the equalizer 30 seconds later. Seven minutes later, Peters scored his second goal of the game and that was all the Stars would need.
Joseph Fallon, once again, got the start in goal and stopped 28 of 31 shots. Brian Connelly and Mike Brennan got assists on the lone Rockford goal.
—Shawn Lalonde was scoreless in Belleville’s 3-2 shootout loss to the Ottawa 67’s. Lalonde was first shooter in the shootout and was denied.
—Byron Froese had two assists and was the third star of the game in Everett’s 4-3 shootout win over the Kamloops Blazers.
—Brandon Pirri was held in check in RPI’s 4-1 loss to Niagara.