Blackhawks 6, Blues 3

It seems many of the Blackhawks’ most physical games this season have been played against inferior, desperate teams.  Saturday night in St. Louis against the Blues was no different.

It all started with the referees giving the dirty physical play their blessing by allowing Barett Jackman to give Patrick Kane a forearm shiver at center ice.  There was no call, and everyone in the building – apparently, except for the refs – and everyone at home knew the game would get out of hand; it certainly did.

Lucky for the Hawks, though, while the Blues were focused on ratcheting up the dirty, desperate play, the Hawks were busy burying them on the scoreboard.  Both succeeded.

After two first period goals by Thomas Kopecky and the fourth line and a Ben Eager sponsored beating of BJ Crombeen, the Hawks were beating the Blues at their own game and where it counts. 

Before the first ended, another fringe NHL-er – though it was hard to tell one from another last night – Mike Weaver, took an open-ice run at Patrick Sharp, sending Sharp into the air and onto his back.  Cam Barker immediately stepped in, fighting Weaver.  Of course, as is appropriate in today’s NHL, Weaver received no penalty – not even a fighting major – and Barker received 17 minutes of infractions, including a game misconduct. 

The scoreboard beating took off in the second, when Brian Campbell and Kris Versteeg goals gave the Hawks breathing room.  The goals came amidst more physical play, including Jonathan Toews’ first fight of the season against David Backes, a huge Ben Eager hit on Carlo Calaiacovo and offsetting penalties to Versteeg and David Perron.  The Versteeg/Perron penalties came after Versteeg pulled Perron from a fracas and Perron threw Versteeg to the ground before pinning his head to the ice.  It was another lesson on how to let a game get out of control.

The third saw Sharp get the only payback that matters.  As Mike Weaver played a -3 game, Sharp added two goals within 123 seconds of each other early in the third.  It gave the Hawks a four-goal lead, and ensured St. Louis would pull out all the stops a team that has been beaten badly usually does.

Cue Cam Janssen – he of the zero ’09-’10 points.  Janssen was a one-man wrecking crew, consistently throwing himself into anything that moves and looking to send a message.  (“Look, ma!  I’m a fringe NHL player at best!”)  Message delivered.  Less than two minutes into the final period, Janssen got a two-minute charging call for starting a brawl. 

It was another nice lesson on how to lose control of a game; allow the fourth liner with zero points to start final period brawls with no repercussions.  Gee, you think he’ll be heard from again?

After Keith Tkachuck’s mouth made it a three-goal game, Janssen was at it again.  Janssen made the referees look downright silly when he threw a flying elbow at Brent Sopel with less than four minutes left to play in the game.  No one seems to know quite what happened in the ensuing melee, but you can guess the rest: a phantom match penalty for Ben Eager and … wait for it … wait for it … a three-minute power play for the home Blues.

Ain’t the NHL grand?

Taking Deep Breaths…

– I suppose we can put the enforcer debate to rest once and for all.  On a night the Hawks toughness was challenged, the fourth line scored the game’s first two goals.  Though the Hawks ended up with over 60 minutes in penalties, the Blues’ fourth line showed that they were far out-classed by the Hawks fourth liners.  Case closed.

– It was said nearly 100 times last night, but Brent Sopel was fantastic.  He’s been solid all year, and his performance on the kill last night earned him some late power play time.  Much deserved.

– Jordan Hendry has shown improved confidence with the puck during the last few weeks.

– No team with Barett Jackman as a top pairing defenseman will ever be good.  When Patrick Kane blows by you and throws you to the ground on the same rush, you might be an AHLer. 

– I’m not sure what to make of Toews’ challenging of Backes early in the second, but I suppose I can’t condemn it.  In a physical game that would soon get well out of hand, I think it was refreshing to see the Hawk captain grab a 6’3″ man and attempt to pound him at center ice.  Moreover, the stat sheet shows the Hawks scored four straight following the spirited scrap.

– New Blues (interim) head coach [insert first name that I (i) don’t care about and (ii) will never need to know after the world sees how bad the Blues are over the next few weeks] Payne was apparently looking to send a message during last night’s beating.  ‘We’re horrible, but we’ll try to kill you.’  Good luck with that in another league, coach.  Take half of your roster with you.

This entry was posted in 2009-2010 Game Recaps. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Blackhawks 6, Blues 3

  1. Lou says:

    Gentleman, this blog was truly excellent. Well said. Since I beat up the enforcer debate on the previous post. I will say no more.

    One thing that impressed me yesterday was Buff’s two way play. He back checked his ass off.

    As for the reffing it was poor and you’d expect better from Marouelli. Kerry Fraser, Rob Shick, and Van Hellemond no but Marouelli yes.

  2. Dan says:

    Daily reader and first time I felt I absolutely had to comment…

    Best. recap. ever. Spot on.

    Thanks for publishing this site. It’s the first thing I want to read once the game is over.

  3. Dr. Ice says:

    According to the box score, Barker was actually assessed an eye-popping 27 minutes in penalties. 2 for instigating, 5 for fighting, 10 for a 10-min misconduct, and 10 for a game misconduct (aggressor).

  4. Dr. Ice says:

    Oh, and one more thing. I’ve watched the replay five or six times now, and I’m still not sure what Eager did to deserve a match penalty.

  5. synaptique says:

    I haven’t seen the replays of the Eager/Jackman scrum (accidentily changed the channel later and lost my tivo rewind abilities), but it appeared that he had Jackman in a headlock, and when Jackass came out of it, he had a gouge under his right eye. My best guess is that whatever Eager did to him there, the ref saw and decided it was worth the match penalty.

  6. synaptique says:

    That’s what I noticed watching it live, anyway

  7. Tim says:

    Tkachuck’s goal should have been disallowed, he interfered with Huet. After the puck hit Tkachuck in the face, it his Huet in the chest and dropped in front of him. Then Tkachuck fell on top of Huet in the goal crease and the puck went in tthe net. Too bad he was bloodied, but he clearly interfered with Huet. There really are no rules in hockey, just what the refs feel like calling. Just witness the rest of the missed calls during the game, including at least 4 offsides on the Blues that weren’t called, including one that resulted in a goal. These ref’s werent fit to ref a mite game.

  8. Old Barn says:

    On the subject of Toews last night, I applaud the kid. He did what a leader must do. He stood up to the bully and said we aren’t afraid of this crap. He sent a message both to the Blues and the league that you can try this style of play but you won’t intimidate us from our goal of beating you!

  9. David says:

    The match penalty was for bandages on his hands, I guess it’s part of the league’s fighting rules. He won’t be suspended though. Further explanation here:

  10. Dr. Ice says:

    I agree. I think I’d feel much differently if Backes had landed a hammer and broken the captain’s cheekbone or something, but I’m ok with Toews’ show of muscle last night.

  11. Matthew says:

    Tkachuk actually scored with his mouth on that 3-minute powerplay, not before. Unless I was really drunk, which is possible.

  12. blackhawkbob says:

    Matthew: A quick look back at the scoresheet proves your point; the Blues scored on the late power play, rather than before it.

    I suppose I took a page out of the St. Louis Blues’ book for our recap, focusing on all the bull shit rather than any of the goal scoring.

    Thanks for pointing that out.

  13. Lou says:

    Hey can you guys give us an injury update on Bolland and Burish if you have em on the next blog. More intersted in their progress towards coming back

  14. John says:

    No idea on Bolland. Burish was back skating last week but is still considered to be a couple months out from returning.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s