Blues 4, Blackhawks 2

It’s hard to be upset when a four-game win streak is snapped.  Sure, you can look back at all the beautiful memories – turn on your favorite Sarah Mclachlan song and the feel the emotion pour over you – but in the end, you’ll realize that the Hawks can’t win them all.  Let’s just put it behind us and get to thoughts.

– We’ve talked about it before, but the biggest effect from the summer exodus has to be the third line we’re now witness to.  In the past two seasons, the Hawks had Martin Havlat and then Kris Versteeg to play responsibly on one end and create opportunities on the other.  Each did a fantastic job hiding Dave Bolland’s odd inability to play full-, even-strength hockey, but I digress.  Now, we’re treated to 12 minutes of Bolland-Pisani-Bickell nightly – not quite the same thing.  On paper, Bolland should be ready to carry a third line, but that hasn’t happened  – and I’m not holding my breath.

The lack of depth has been hidden a bit by the hot starts of Marian Hossa and Patrick Sharp, but on a night that the Hawks didn’t score on even strength, it would have been nice to get a contribution from the third line – just like old times.  Alas, it didn’t happen, and unfortunately, it doesn’t look like it will any time soon.

Time to panic?  No.  Remember, the third line didn’t take shape in each of the past two seasons until at least late November.  I get the feeling Jack Skille and Viktor Stalberg are in ‘third line boot camp’ during the early going, but only time will tell.  In the meantime, let me know if you see Dave Bolland.

– Add “frightening” to the list of adjectives that come to mind to describe the Jack Skille experience.  He’s absolutely electric, but for the love of everything holy, he’ll have to come up with an offensive move of some sort to avoid being planted half-a-dozen times like he was yesterday evening.  He had over 10 minutes of ice against the Blues, but according to my unofficial box score, he spent seven of them on his arse.

– Speaking of the fourth line, Jake Dowell had a decent night in the Lou.  He also held his own against BJ Crombeen, which is no easy task.  I mean, John could do it, but it ain’t easy.

– We’ve all noticed how Ham Sandwich helped Brian Campbell’s game along, but let’s hope Campbell’s return helps Sandwich.  Sandwich has been all over the place, and last night played more than five minutes less than … (wait for it) … Nick Boynton.  You may ask yourself, well, how did we get here?

– It’s virtually fact now: Jonny T. don’t like no Octobers.  Toews had a quasi-one-on-one against Halak down one in the third, and he crapped all over himself, practically handing the puck to the Blues’ netminder.  Perhaps someone should reset his cell phone and all the clocks around him in an attempt to convince him it’s actually the middle of May.  Of course, he’ll be fine, but it is weird to watch the October trend that’s developing for him.

– I bet you John Scott could watch The Notebook without crying.  I wonder what gets our gentle giant emotional – because hand-to-hand combat with Brad Winchester certainly doesn’t do it.

– All-in-all, eh, what are you going to do?  I know it’s difficult sometimes, but this is one of those games we need to avoid making negative generalizations over (except when I do it; then it’s OK).  St. Louis has always been a difficult place to win, and the Hawks are still very much searching for themselves – sort of like the really religious girl from high school who came back for winter break after her first college semester with a nose ring and syphilis.  If the goal in this analogy is to have a piercing and an STD, consider Jonny Toews Jesse James come January.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 2010-2011 Recaps. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Blues 4, Blackhawks 2

  1. Big Tony says:

    I have AT&T and for some reason the CSN feed wasn’t available until after the game. I guess they picked a good game to make me miss due to technical difficulties.

  2. Sam says:

    I think our influence is becoming too much for you. Jesse James, really?

  3. mechanicalTurk says:

    That is one hell of a closing paragraph.

  4. Cam says:

    The Hawks were physically manhandled and never responded. That was disappointing.

  5. Scott says:

    Big tony I have AT&T too and was livid it wasn’t on. Streamed it at atdhe.net (think that’s the website) if it happens again

  6. Big Tony says:

    Scott., I did manage to find an online feed in the 3rd period. I was occupied with the ALCS anyway. Anytime the Yankees get knocked out is good TV.

  7. Zach says:

    While it’s true you can’t win them all, you hate to see a losing streak snapped because of a dribble in goal and then taking a bad penalty with two minutes left in the game.

  8. alpo says:

    I hate Fernando Pisani.

  9. Cam says:

    Is it time to panic after that effort against Columbus?

    This team doesn’t play defense and has way too much dead weight.

  10. Lou says:

    Not time to panic. But it really shows us the value of Soup on the back end. Boyton is a third pair d man and needs to stay there. Scott brings nothing. We aren’t clearing the puck well and we are a little too fancy with the puck sometimes. Good things happen when you put the puck on the net. Bolland has his head so far up his tocus right now it is scary.

    On the positive we are seeing a good young goalie in Crawford.

  11. Cam says:

    Campbell’s absence doesn’t explain all of their issues. The defensive effort is extremely soft and is not being made up for with puck possession.

    How on earth do you surrender 40 shots–20 in the third–to a poor Columbus team that just got clobbered at home by the Flames the previous night?

  12. Lou says:

    Correct it doesn’t. However, it puts bottom pair defensemen playing bottom pair minutes not top two pairing minutes.

    Poor PK play, a virtually ineffective third line starting with Bolland and our inablilty to clear pucks in any situation account for a significant piece f that.

    Campbell will add a significant piece to helping clear the puck especially at even strength.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s