Blackhawks 4, Ducks 1

And, we’re back – refreshed and ready to go.

As usual, before the triptophan completely wore off from Thursday’s turkey dinner, the Hawks were knee deep in Duck.  And, for the first time since the match-up became commonplace in ’08-’09, the Hawks actually scored – and won.  But, until almost midway through the second, it looked like more of the same; that’s when Duncan Keith snapped the Hawks Black Friday scoreless streak with a one-timer from the slot while shorthanded.  It set the Hawks up to add three during the third and move their Circus Trip record to 3-2 with one left.

Each of the three were rather pretty, the first of which came from Patrick Sharp, who stole a bad own-zone pass from Andy Sutton and absolutely rifled a wrist shot over the glove of Jonas Hiller from the slot.  Ham Sandwich and Troy Brouwer followed up with nifty goals of their own with Brouwer’s coming off a tic-tac-toe play among the fourth liners.

Mas o Menos

– What’s been wrong with the Hawks during the first quarter of this year?  Well, I can tell you what isn’t wrong.

While the common answer seems to be ‘new players and less depth,’ I don’t necessarily buy it.  Depth isn’t the issue.  In fact, a nice argument could be made that Dowell-Skille-Brouwer is head and shoulders better than Fraser-Burish-Eager-(Injury Sub) as a fourth line.  Sure, Bolland-Pisani-Bickell isn’t Bolland-Versteeg-Ladd, but remember, the Hawks played most of last season without Bolland, so the problem can’t be the third line.

I think you could point to all the ridiculous line combinations used by Coach Q early on and say that the roster turnover caused big problems – and probably cost some games and points – but those problems are past and the mediocrity continues.

Yeah, the third pairing isn’t quite what it was last year without Brent Sopel, but c’mon, it’s Brent Sopel for crying out loud.  Plus, the Hawks played plenty of good hockey without Sopes (as his wife calls him on her blog) a couple seasons ago, and that went fine.

The big difference seems to be the defense’s involvement in the offensive game and everything that precedes it.  As I discussed a couple weeks ago, the breakouts have been terrible.  And, when the Hawks are unable to leave their own zone with possession, the defense can’t be activated, and Keith and others can’t join the offensive zone on the second level.  Just like that, many of the goals the Hawks scored last year disappear.  It all starts in their own zone – the new guys certainly need to improve in this regard – and the sooner Q can solve the breakout, the better.

The good news is that it’s been better the past couple weeks.

– Perhaps the problem is not the new players, but the incumbents.  Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane and Marian Hossa have been invisible far too many nights this year.

– It ain’t goaltending.  Corey Crawford is looking to continue the trend of no-name goalies backstopping successful teams in the NHL.  It’s only November, but it’s further evidence that Bowman made the right move with Antti Niemi (and not because Crawford has been solid – because using recent history, it seems just as likely that a good team can get good goaltending from a lesser known goalie as a big name, highly paid ‘tender).  Assuming the Hawks can get into the playoffs, they may well have two goalies capable of making an individual run.  And neither will break the bank.

This entry was posted in 2010-2011 Recaps. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Blackhawks 4, Ducks 1

  1. Bobby Hull's Liver says:

    Nice write-up, as usual. One thing that stuck out for me – maybe a relatively minor detail – was the short backswing by Ham Sandwich on his goal. Maybe I’m over-analyzing, but the lack of quick shots by the point men has been a point of contention for me. The biggest example being that painful loss to NYRs, witnessing a few dozen shots blocked. The usual example being every shot by the likes of Cullimore. Again, I might be making too much of it, but IMO it’s these small things that can turn this team around on a more consistent basis.

  2. Lee says:

    They are still very “SOFT”

  3. Big Tony says:

    Lee, you said the same garbage last year…how’d that work out?

  4. Ban says:

    They’re softer than last year. That’s not to say they need to fight, but please, please, please finish your checks.

  5. AC says:

    I agree that they have to finish checks. While being “soft” to me doesn’t mean a thing about how many fights they get into, not having Ladd finishing checks seems to be killing the 3rd line. Also, don’t overlook that 3rd line, we had Ladd-Madden-Steeg most of last year and they would embarras the current third line.

  6. Marts says:

    Growing up, we were always taught that being “tough” was winning races to the puck and taking a check to make the play. That being said, if you throw checks when the opportunity is there, your opponent will start to “lose” races to the puck. Bottom line… having more will than your opponent. Work ethic. And I stand by my over-riding feeling that its missing at times this season.

  7. Lee says:

    I did not say soft meant no fights. Soft to me is they don t play Physical although I must say that John Scott last night was awesome in that fight and did not look horrible as a forward. Big Tony show me last year where i said soft was fighting? Yes, I wanted an enforcer last year but for sure they need Scott this year because if you notice they are now going after the Kanes and Toews and did not last year

  8. Lou says:

    You continue come up with every way to spin doctor a goon on skates every game every which way you can. Scott is not even a role player. He is a complete unidimensional pugilistic goon. He has less than minimal hockey skills and it is surprising he can stay uprgiht long enough to fight. when he plays we lose the ability to role 4 lines or 3 pairs. He spends nearly as much time in the box as on the ice. That is not value added.

    So just stop the whole debate now. It was old last year and it is ancient this year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s